Sunday, December 6, 2020

Humility testimony

This is a private post for my own records. 

There was an experience with humility that is always in the back of my mind.  It was years ago but it's still vivid to me.  I've been around humble people before, and it struk me as a noble trait.  However, I had an experience that left a permanent memory.  There was a moment when I sensed a degree of humility emanating from the divine that was so compelling that when I encountered it, I was unable to maintain my composure. There was no pride in what emanated. The goodness of character was of such a degree that it permeated everything, namely my heart.  I lost it.  The obvious moral authority caused what felt like a loss or a draining of my own strength. The contrast between myself and what was communicated was too great to bear and it compelled surrender.  Had I not sat down I felt as though I would have fallen down.  

The good news of the Gospel I believe centers on the person of God and His attributes. It's very encouraging and very hope filling.  It leaves a permanent contrast in the mind. A contrast between the things of God vs everything down here in this fallen world. It resolves all dispute and question about who matters.  It's Him, it's Him who we need to get to know for life and salvation. I don't know why someone would fixate on a man, celebrity, or Church men and be satisfied with that when the Lord has declared himself knowable in the scriptures.  It's fun to get to know Him.   

I think the better definition of a testimony is not what someone believes, but something a person can testify of.  So with that definition, I have a testimony to some degree as I can testify of one aspect of God's nature.  He is humble, and meek.  In His words "I am meek and lowly of heart." This is truth.  

We all owe him everything.  We should listen to Him, and the messages He sends through those He has called.  All else is vanity.  

Uncertainty - political and prophetic

Maybe it's the Covid virus thing or perhaps the mess of the media with the 2020 election, but lately I've noticed an enormous number of news articles who's substance is founded on uncertainty. It's artificial. These headlines and articles use words and phrases such as:

Probably
Possibly
Possible
Potentially
Might
Could 
May  
Perhaps
Maybe

That's not substance.  Those are nothingness portrayed as predictions you need to pay attention to. Some of that is to be expected in the media but it's almost become almost part of the foundation of the media.  It's assumed that people accept them as almost prophecies. Which may actually improve the chances of some negative thing occurring because now people are expecting that thing the news fed as a probability. Smells like garbage to me.  Lo here, lo there.  

I'm not a journalist but constantly portraying an imagined fearful future of "might" and "could" "perhaps" as if it was a substantive news article seems like piss poor journalism. It's misleading. Bottom of the barrel way to drum up ratings and readers. Using fear and uncertainty which is something we are all vulnerable to.  And deliberately playing off of it to portray an artificial world founded on "might be" to entice people in.  Uncertainty is conveniently always deniable, because one can always point back to the fact that someone said "might" and thus get off the hook for the effects of them saying pretty much whatever they want.            





The virus never-solution: 

Why is the solution to this virus mess never to give the public as accurate of information as public governmental leaders are able to provide, and then let every man, woman, family, or business decide for themselves how best to protect themselves and carry out their lives according to their unique situations?  The news would have to simply state facts and not have to deal with bogus national or worldwide uncertainty risks that don't even apply to most people.  Just give facts, and let people choose.  

Prophetic Uncertainty:

In other recent news there was President Nelson's worldwide message and social media gratitude blitz video.  In the 11 minute video the Church too is also using uncertainty phrases that can neither be proved nor disproved and always has plausible deniability.  In the 11 minute Church video President Nelson said, with a look of uncertainty on his face: "Perhaps, this will fulfill, in part, the promise God gave to Father Abraham".  Perhaps? In part?  Is it possible to be any more more noncommittal about your statement?  This is proverbial emperor with not clothes type of statement.

As one writer put it:  Gratitude, social media blitzes, high-tech equivalents of the Rameumptom and virtue signaling are definitely NOT what God would be telling us to do to…they're not the "urgent and important" remedies for mankind's sins, and you know it.

The hashtag associated to this Church video quickly became the No. 1 trending topic on Twitter in the United States and was still the second-biggest trending topic more than two hours after the video posted and remained in the top five for several hours.  Popularity is apparently important to those producing these videos.  

For some reason they had President Nelson use eye color changing lenses for this video....    I don't even know if I want to find out why they would do something like this.  




I also learned that pretty much none of the Quorum of the 12 and President Nelson himself followed his own message to post on social media for 7 days.  None of them apparently took it seriously enough to follow along. See here.  

Thursday, October 15, 2020

Generic Conference

 This showed up in my inbox a few days before LDS General Conference earlier this month.      

A few random observations for my own record.   

The virus will not stop the Lord from embracing us the announcement says. The proposition that a virus is somehow keeping God socially distanced is pretty lame.  Really lame in fact.  Not sure who thought God was having to obey social distancing rules. 

I get that the statement is trying to be reassuring.  But there's something else troubling about that statement. Some things DO keep people form coming to Christ and receiving Him.  So why are those things ignored, and rarely taught?  Instead, we are constantly fed a diet of emotionally reassuring messages.  These statements in the message presume our own alignment with God.  They presume we are righteous and pleasing God with our every thought and deed.  That seems like a pretty big assumption on our part. 

I like the assurance those scriptures provide, but what I don't like is passing them off as guarantees that completely bypass the fact that we may be VERY VERY misaligned with God.  But we do enjoy our warm fuzzies or comforting sentiment we feel when speakers say things that we like or say things which make us feel special. 

Yet, at the same time, doctrine such as actually coming to Christ is not only not taught, it's warned about! (See  this piece on the "Boise Rescue").  


After this last conference and looking back at the message from the Church in my inbox, I'm left concluding that these reassuring messages are in reality, not reassuring at all.  They don't prepare you for anything, nor tell you a great deal of substance about our current situation in 2020.  It tastes a bit like cotton candy.  It's more like feel good nothingness. The message are often a religious recap of what you read in the news or whatever the flavor or social issue of the month is.  And for the time being, that's definitely the virus.   

As the pandemic alarm was getting started in the US last April, The Church called for and held a worldwide fast. The fast's stated purpose included a petition for life to normalize and the economy to be strengthened. Below are some worldwide numbers around the same time as this fast. Hopefully the below stats are not considered normal.    

Really?  We fast for the world to return to normal?   Seems we are straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel.


It's an interesting question to ask if the fast worked. Such a thing is difficult to measure.  Did anyone repent of anything like what scriptures speak of?  We were even asked to repent of anything?  Or was this worldwide Covid fast more of a superficial petition for resumed economic prosperity and to go back to the same stuff we were doing before the pandemic?  Food for thought. 

What I do know is that when we do what God asks, promises follow.  But when we don't, we don't have the same assurance.  

At least the satire news keeps hope up that we'll repent.  


Back to the recent LDS generic general conference. The invitation said to prepare to hear the words of the Lord spoken through His servants.  The servants referred to are of course the leaders of the Church who would speak.  That's a really inspiring thought, hearing the words of the Lord. If it doesn't pan out, it must be the members who didn't prepare or are deaf. Or at least that's what I'm told. 

Now going back to the e-mail I got inviting me to conference. The D&C 84:88 scripture quoted on the e-mail caught my attention. I'm starting to be less surprised at the frequency with which leaders use scriptures completely out of context. Doing that was bad practice as a missionary, but when the example continues to be set by the leaders I'm left with diminishing hope of the course reversing.  Out of context scriptures appear to mostly just mislead people.     

Ok, so, referring to the worldwide church message that showed up in my inbox, they cite D&C 84:88 

88 And whoso receiveth you, there I will be also, for I will go before your face. I will be on your right hand and on your left, and my Spirit shall be in your hearts, and mine angels round about you, to bear you up.

The Lord did promise to be on the right and left and angels to surround. But who did he promise that to?  Is this promise applicable to anyone who tunes into LDS general conference? That seems to be what was implied by the Church announcement. It seemed to suggest that we (the audience of the e-mail) are the ongoing recipients of this D&C promise. But who was that scripture speaking to, and on what grounds? 

D&C 84:88 is talking to the messengers/apostles the Lord himself sent out. They were to carry neither purse nor script for their ministry (hardly applicable to today's leaders). They were to be taken care of and dependent on the people they ministered to. They were in fact true messengers with a message from God. Rather than their own message, they preached God's message. As a result, God made these quoted promises to THEM. That's pretty specific. Don't get me wrong, I think we should apply all scriptures to ourselves, but I don't think that means you simply inherit promises made to other people at another time, simply by reading about them.  

Part of the promise found in verse 88 was situational.  These messengers were going out to preach without means for their own support. Is that how our leaders go out into the world? Without purse or script?  What proper comparisons ought we to make or not make between our day and these scriptures? Can we claim the same promises apply to our day simply because leaders have titles that sound the same as leaders in that day? Can we as members turn around also and feel warm fuzzies that these same reassuring promises apply to us when we don't even know the context of the promises? 

Also from D&C 88:  

Behold, I send you out to reprove the world of all their unrighteous deeds, and to teach them of a judgment which is to come.

So how do we prepare for the coming judgement? One conference talk put forward the great import of possessing a temple recommend. I questioned whether that would ultimately prove helpful in the face of the judgement scriptures speak of.  Temple reccomends give the members a nice bit of reassurance, but is it the right kind of reassurance? 

So you might ask, if a temple recommend isn't a solid bit of assurance, then what would help prepare for the coming judgement D&C 88 speaks of? We hopefully all know the answer to that.  It's to repent, turn from all the garbage that surrounds us, and follow Christ. Who I believe is actively speaking to mankind today. 

One of the biggest concerns that crossed my mind as I read this church-wide e-mail is that religion is reassuring us with soothing out of context words that may well leave us totally empty and unprepared for God's judgements. That's the concern here. Is that cliché phrases and feel good talks that mention Jesus a lot sooth, and lull people to sleep. They do nothing to show our actual state before God. Which the scriptures say is "awful". They stop short of preparing us for how to actually come to Christ. The scriptures said our collective situation was awful before the pandemic, but we seem to want to return to it as quickly as possible.  

Anyway, that email message at the beginning of this post said we have special opportunity to feel the Lord's love during the upcoming General Conference. "Feel" they say. It's all about feelings. We seem to mistake feeling for doctrine, facts for sentiment, emotional stories for truth. It's a crazy day we live in when we cannot tell the difference between emotion and truth.    

What ever happened to learning something? If all we ever want is to "feel" the feelings produced by listening to men (only 2 women spoke during all of the General Sessions) in suits talk from atop a multi billion dollar religious empire.... well we already have that. And it's not producing Zion.     

"Invite others" they said.... to listen to these messages. So they too can "feel" this apparently amazing feeling.  

We've become saturated by feelings and don't seem to notice anymore how we know less and less about Christ's gospel. Less and less substance seems to be the new norm.  I mean apparently there was so little said in conference that was noteworthy that the Church's own Deseret News turned to the talk's footnotes for something interesting to report about conference, see here.     

General Conference has become disappointingly generic. The Latter-day famine continues. It may give you a warm fuzzy though!

On another note, there's a great new video series over at LearnofChrist.org. And maybe Joseph Smith did not practice polygamy.  But don't count on that being taught in generic conference anytime soon.  

Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Temple Prayer Roll

Various years ago I wrote about the funny little placard I noticed on the LDS temple prayer roll boxes.

At the time I was amused at the restriction on the number of people you could submit to the prayer roll. Apparently at some point there was a conversation or a problem that made it all the way up to the leadership levels.  It had to have been such a problem that it resulted in a mass produced gold placard at every single temple.  It's funny to contemplate but it appears that at some point in time temple patrons were simply praying for too many people, and such apparently immature and unchristian mischief had to be stopped.  I guess the capacity of the little box was just being exceeded too often?  Or the capacity of the prayers?  It's a bit of a mystery.    

Today I got an e-mail from the LDS Church about temple prayer roll box submissions letting me know they have now been made digital.  At last! Now space constraints are no longer an issue.  But what interestingly continues to be an issue for the LDS church is the quantity of how many people you can submit names for.  This restriction continues, even with digital pray role submissions.  This continues to be very amusing. 

(The banner image for the temple prayer roll announcement above has one man and TWO adult women leaving the temple... Maybe it's their adult daughter.  Maybe adult females attending the temple with just their parents is normal? This is a prayer roll announcement so their choice of image is funny. If the two women are not mother-daughter, and this is one man leaving the temple with two women, oh boy, that brings to mind a variety of other ideas the LDS church has tried hard to avoid..... but I digress)

Below is the new Church instruction on this matter of submitting names, but now digitally. The gold placard (which you can see in the background of the Church provided picture below) has been replaced with a new version of the same message, but now it's on the website where you make submissions.  

The previous placard said "long lists" were inappropriate.  But it was left it up to discretion of the patron whether their submission met that standard or not. The size of those tiny white pieces of paper they provide you (also shown in the image) helps to not-so-subtly communicate the desired number of people they think you ought to submitting names for.    

But now to the NEW message they have for the patrons when it comes to who and how many people you can submit for prayer roll.  The electronic submission announced August 2020 has a 5 name max per request!  See image caption.  Maybe this is a logistical thing for if they try to print out the submissions to physically have on hand for prayers.  I wonder what is behind this.  Why 5?  That's not even enough for a lot of Utah parents to include all of their children! I have 11 siblings, so.... maybe they can help me determine which one I can't submit a name for?  Only the special ones? Guess the non special are out of luck.   


Do not prophets and authors of scripture often pray and intercede on behalf of entire cities?  Nations?  Shall we go smack them on the hand and inform them that it's inappropriate to name off more than 5 individuals?  I get that you can pray for any number of people yourself if you want to.  But this limitation on temple prayer roll just seems funny to me. 

When Jesus came to the Nephites, to the temple (3 Nephi 11:1) it says this in verse 23: And now Father, I pray unto thee for them, and also for all those who shall believe on their words.

WHOA stop right there Jesus.... you came to the temple and are sending prayers to God for TOO many people.  In order to use our services you will have to split that up into groups  individuals of 5.  Sorry bout that Jesus, rules are rules.    

Ok, humor aside, I would never complain if my name was one in a long list of names submitted for prayer at a temple. How many people are really causing this to be a problem?  And even IF members got carried away with such a practice.... is that not the least of all the problems for a global religion in 2020 during a pandemic and natural unrest?? 

Tuesday, June 9, 2020

When the wicked rule

Heavy topics face America right now.

The old testament has this timeless wisdom: When the wicked rule the people morn.

When we think of those who rule it's typically those in power whether governmental, economic, religious, or any with power and some form of authority.  Which of course it is.  But lately it's become more apparent the media can also rule the public perception.  And even sometimes rule or manipulate those holding power. 

The public too can also rule in many ways.  They can demand reform, and demand change and force an agenda or manipulate with fear causing even more chaos and destruction.  There are many who appear to want to rule and reign with (utilizing) blood and horror as an effective platform to gain listeners.

Anyway, many companies in America are putting out public statements regarding racism.  The Church recently put out a statement about racism.  This is from the Church News:
“We abhor the reality that some would deny others respect and the most basic of freedoms because of the color of his or her skin. We are also saddened when these assaults on human dignity lead to escalating violence and unrest.”
President Nelson’s message addressed the death of George Floyd — a black man who died on May 25 after a white police officer knelt on his neck while restraining him — and ensuing protests, riots and violence.
These statements condemn and the Church's own past leaders and past doctrine, completely contradicting and "abhorring" (their word choice, not mine) past leaders.  They abhor and condemn those from whom they derive their authority.  It's an odd thing.  It begs the question of whether in 20 years future leaders will again abhor and condemn things the current leaders teach and say.  

While the world, CEO's, businesses, and heads of religion issue public statements in the wake of the death of George Floyd; I couldn't help but notice the way George died is not unlike what happens all the time as part of a later stage abortion of a voiceless, powerless, restrained infant.  But where is the LDS statement? Where are the protests?  Outrage?  No CEO and brand owner public statements?  How many thousands of voiceless babies die this way?

The public is furious about one issue, meanwhile this other great cause of death which happens in strikingly similar fashion continues with those who lives have been reduced to less than human, and who don't have a voice at all.  It's horrific to me that life ends this way.  It's also horrific that women are sometimes driven to these dreadful extremes, perhaps by no fault of their own. If this topic had protests and outrage and demands for reform to the same degree as these other things we would likely see change.  But this greater cause of death gets far less focus, despite there also being videos available showing what happens.

In looking for a recent LDS public statement on abortion I did find a statement that had no date.  The Church does oppose abortion and they clarify their stance on some of the complexities surrounding the topic.  But the concluding statement on the newsroom page about abortion says this:
"The Church has not favored or opposed legislative proposals or public demonstrations concerning abortion."
What kind of statement is that? For one, it is demonstrably not true.  But besides that, are they afraid to have taken or take a public stand or give support of legislation on the issue?  I wonder on what grounds a Church claiming Christ's name fails to speak clearly on issues that involve the death of children.

But in any event, with the potential for such enormous public backlash companies and businesses and even religions seems to be trying to playing it safe.  Statements without dates, and electronic handbooks also have the added advantage of being able to be easily altered and adjusted as social pressures come and go.  Part of me seeks and wants someone to cut through all the distractions, and boldly and plainly not play it safe, or cater to public approval, but simply state the truth.

The LDS church used to mention abortion but it's obviously not a popular thing for a worldwide religion to openly and outwardly speak about.  It hasn't received near the attention as decades past.


But moving on. This next statement was from a talk given in Hurricane Utah in March 2020.  The entire talk is a very worthwhile read.
But our society suffers most from evils we inflict upon ourselves. It is estimated that in January and February of this year the greatest cause of death in the United States has come from one of our great evils of abortion. An estimated 141,000 abortions in those two months, added to the estimated 51,000,000 slain since 1973. Abortion is the leading cause of death in the US. By tolerating this mass killing we are not unlike those who anciently killed their children sacrificing them to the false god Molech. The Lord repeatedly condemned this:
“And the Lord spoke unto Moses, saying, Again, you shall say to the children of Israel,  Whoever he is, of the children of Israel or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that gives any of his seed unto Molech, he shall surely be put to death. The people of the land shall stone him with stones. And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people because he has given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary and to profane my holy name. And if the people of the land do in any way hide their eyes from the man when he gives of his seed unto Molech and kill him not, then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go whoring after him to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people.”
“that no man might make his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech.”
“to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech, which I commanded them not;”
What kind of a society allows killing 51,000,000 innocent children to continue uninterrupted over 47 years? As we have been told, “Nevertheless, when the wicked rule, the people mourn. Wherefore, honest men and wise men should be sought for diligently, and good men and wise men you should observe to uphold; otherwise, whatever is less than these comes of evil.” We have elected and upheld men and women who have tolerated this obscenity for 47 years. The United States will be punished for this. By and by you will see the “chastening hand of an Almighty God, until the consumption decreed has made a full end of all nations.” That full end of nations will include the US. And so we have an opportunity to prepare, if we will heed the Lord’s counsel.

This is one of the more memorable times I've seen a societies evil pointed out like this, and such a warning given.  "The United States will be punished for this".   Going on to quote a revelation given to Joseph Smith referring to a full end of all nations.  The footnote reads: Scriptural “destruction” does not require annihilation, only the loss of an ability to perpetuate a nation. 

I'm not a doomsday-er but this looks more and more like what is up ahead, hopefully far far up ahead but ahead nonetheless.  We're told we have an opportunity to prepare.  And that it has to be by heeding the Lord's counsel.  Makes me want to find out what that counsel is, and where it can be found.

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

Corona Counfounded

A few thoughts about the current Coronavirus pandemic, as we're a few months in.  Some things about this thing make no sense to me.  A lot of it revolves around the communication.  To help lighten the mood of this potentially heavy topic I included some images with this post to bring some laughs. 

I've always been interested in communication. Verbal, non verbal, body language, how people communicate, and the words and language we use.  Right now my kids are in a development phase where I'm frequently reminding them to "use their words" instead of cry, scream, or remain frustrated with whatever is going on with them. It's also a time to help them put accurate words to their feelings so they can develop good communication skills. Although we talk and communicate all day long, that doesn't always mean we get better at it.  Sometimes our language declines, unnoticed.

But we do get funnier at times. 



Another thing with the pandemic is I see is that historians speak of the importance of documenting life during the pandemic.  So I thought I'd document some things I noticed that were interesting.  Future people looking back at 2020 need to know that our language has become a mess and people don't understand each other.  Misinformation and miscommunication are huge problems.  I mean Corona beer had to halt production for a time due to apparent confusion between Corona beer and Coronavirus. That's how bad it is, and what fear is doing to people.

From am April 2020 national news article:
Corona beer has become a victim of the coronavirus after consumers mistakenly associated it with the highly contagious virus. According to CBS News, 38 percent of surveyed American beer drinkers said they would not buy Corona beer "under any circumstances."



But enough about beer.  Scriptures make reference to language and people who become confounded. We all know about babel, and that ancient effort to build a tower to heaven which resulted in their language being confounded, I'm fascinated by that.  How their language got confounded to the point they couldn't function.

But first a few notes (presenters notes) from a presentation at a Book of Mormon Language Conference hosted by McKay Platt in Provo Utah, January 2020:
(I’ll replace these with a transcript as soon as I can locate a copy)
-The second sentence of Moroni’s title page introduction to the Book of Mormon recalls a time that the Jaredites came from the great tower and refers to “confounding the language”.
-Confounding the language” is generally thought to be a miraculous event where all men speaking in a single tongue suddenly found themselves speaking Japanese, Swahili, Navajo and Finnish.
-The text, however, does not say “suddenly every man was speaking a new language”. It was the people not their language who were confounded. The people were so confounded they thought they could get to Heaven by building a tower. The prayer of the brother of Jared was that the Lord “will not confound us that we may not understand our words”.
-Emerson expresses a parallel thought. “The corruption of man is followed by the corruption of language
-He’s saying, Once men themselves are corrupted- once men start to have stinking thinking—it begins to be reflected in their language.
-Hugh Nibley asks this question about Jared’s prayer, “How can it possibly be said that “we may not understand our words”? Words we cannot understand may be nonsense syllables or may be in some foreign language, but in either case they are not our words. The only way we can fail to understand our own words is to have words that are actually ours change their meaning among us.”
-The word confound is often used to mean confuse but it’s root meaning referred to mixing or blending.
-Language becomes confounded when words change meaning, when new meanings are mixed into the language.
-People become confounded when the philosophies of men are mingled with the word of the Lord.
-And why would Jared worry about such a thing?
Because Jared knew that the new words created by the mixing were not equivalent to the original language.
-Semantic change is a big area of study: virtually our entire vocabulary is subject to words changing meaning. It’s hard to find an old word that means the same thing today as it meant long ago
-Unless you are unusual, you have never been exposed to the original meanings of these English words: nice, silly, fizzle, fathom, clue, myriad, flirt, hussy, egregious and senile. (Nice meant silly and silly meant blessed.) (A Hussy was a housewife)
-I ask my ten-year-old grandson, “what are the latest cool words today?” His answer, lit, dope, dank, swag, swol, gaines, and yeet. If you listen to an extended conversation in young people you are almost guaranteed to hear words you have never heard before.
- Just in the last five years over 40 pronouns have been added for persons who don’t like to be referred to as he or she. They in this context (used as a SINGULAR pronoun) was named 2019 Word of the Year by Merriam-Webster.
-Words changing meaning is often seen as natural and innocuous. Most authors discussing semantic change do not hint a dark side to the corruption of language as Emerson does and as Book of Mormon authors do.
-Mormon taught that mixing or blending leads to incorrect traditions which leads to destruction. You might have thought that Mormon was talking about interracial marriage but listen to his words.
....”the Lord God might preserve his people, that they might not mix and believe in incorrect traditions which would prove their destruction.” (Alma 3:8)
-Mormon is unconcerned about diluting the genes of some Master Race but instead about mixing ideas and traditions leading to incorrect traditions which lead to destruction. The Adversary is behind the destruction. We once taught in our temples that It is he who mixes or mingles the words of scripture with philosophies of men. And he does it to in order to obscure truth.
-Emerson explains how man, corrupted by impure motives then proceeds to corrupt language:
-A man’s power to connect his thought with its proper symbol, ...depends on the simplicity of his character, that is, upon his love of truth, and his desire to communicate it without loss. (He is describing uncorrupted man) The corruption of man is followed by the corruption of language. When simplicity of character and the sovereignty of ideas is broken up by ...secondary desires, the desire of riches, of pleasure, of power, and of praise, — and duplicity and falsehood take (the) place of simplicity and truth....old words are perverted to stand for things which are not;...In due time, the fraud is manifest, and words lose all power....”

I see a lot of language confounding and people confounding again in our day.  It has been especially noticeable during this pandemic.  Our language is so confounded that satire sites made good use of it creating satirical guides about the meaning of people's words vs the words themselves.  The reason this next graphic is funny is because often it feels like there are elements of truth to it. But some are just absurd.  Have a look:



I ask myself, are these kinds of miscommunications a result of the population just being hysterical and overly stressed out?  Likely not, since public, governmental, and religious leaders are also communicating using words that don't match up with what the words mean.  The masses are not totally to blame for our confounded pandemic language.  A few examples:

"Social Distancing".  What the heck is social distancing?  This is not a scientific or medical concept. Social distancing would be something like socially keeping people out of your life, or remaining isolated from social contact with others. That is a social distance.  But contrary to common sense, we've taken physical distancing, even measured by the authorities as 6 physical feet, and then called it social distancing. This is bizarre vocabulary embraced by experts, political leaders, religious leaders and the media. "Socially distanced" sounds like a mental health diagnoses or a syndrome resulting from germ paranoia. 

Socially distancing carries a message that we kind of ought to fear each other, and socially isolate ourselves at a distance. The idea here is that physical distance reduces the spread and likelihood of virus transmission.  But for some reason we can't just say that. The virus doesn't care about how social you are.  Physical distance, not social distance is what will have an effect on avoiding germs.  One example of our language going weird.

And aren't we supposed to be dealing with germs and viruses all the time?  Isn't that how our immune systems stay healthy?  Unless your somehow immune compromised or have underlying issues, then healthy people aren't supposed to be avoiding every germ like it was the plague.   

Fear has often ruled the day in 2020.  Due to sometimes drastically incorrect data models.



If there is anything that has caused social issues during this pandemic it's been fear, false information, and calculated misdirection.  The media perpetuates it, and fans the flames of hysteria and fear all the time. People on both sides of issues claim the other sides lies or misleads.  Floods of lies. People end up buying toilet paper and household cleaner's (like Lysol) in a panic. The media coverage of the pandemic has been disastrous for America.




Confounded language has led to country wide confusion, misdirection, and rampant misunderstanding.  It was probably already happening, but I paid more attention this year.  Not just with the pandemic, every area of conversation seems like the definitions of words are not shared among people. What a person thinks a word means IS what the word means, so everyone lives in a distanced reality.

Another word I noticed during all this: "Quarantine".  Quarantine is what you do to sick people to isolate them from healthy people so as to not infect others or to protect the person who is ill and vulnerable.  "House arrest" is more correct term for forcing healthy people inside their houses and not letting them have freedom of movement or freedom to gather physically with others, or peacefully protest.  Like what we're seeing in the US.  Forms of house arrest would normally need substantial evidence as it violates constitutional rights. Not just fear, theories, and projections.  Quarantine is a more palatable word though.  But people in many states saw their constitutional rights erode.

President Trump hasn't been able to stay out of the news for sometimes even a few hours. Someone pointed out that the thing to notice in all of this is not "The President" but "The Precedent". 



People identify the pandemic as the cause of things that were sometimes more of a result of a lock-down than the virus or sick people.  Yes the two things are connected, but the effects of the virus and the effects of the Lock-down are not totally interchangeable. Millions and millions of people are out of work and suffering not because they are sick, or got sick, but because of our societies response.  But if you conflate the virus with the countries response to the virus.  Well you can blame just about anything for anything.            

Some other evidence of our confounded language.

"Pandemic".  This word refers to the how transmissible or prevalent the spread of a disease is.  It is not an indication of the severity of the disease.  But the public perception is that pandemic = super duper dangerous life altering and life threatening disease, basically the plague.  That's not what the word means.  But enough fear and a confounded language, there's no doubt hysteria will follow. 

"State of Emergency".  Something a lot of states keep declaring, and keep declaring, and keep declaring.


Another one:  "New Normal".   What is new normal?  Things that are normal typically aren't questioned.  But I think we should question anything that's pitched to us as a new normal.  Because if you accept the new definition of normal, you automatically don't question it. 

Is it normal for the government to shut down business, restrict your freedom of movement, restrict your freedom to gather, restrict your freedom to worship or peacefully protest grievances you have about the governments overreach?   I can see better hand-washing as a better normal behavior.  More awareness and care of the elderly and those with health conditions making them vulnerable.  Those are great standards for us to maintain.  But the government handing out trillion + dollars because they forced you to shut down business is not normal.  There is a different word for that, and it seems dangerous to lump such things into a new "normal".  Is it the role and job of government to forcefully under rule of law, protect you from the vicissitudes of nature?



Non essential.  These are people who are not going to work anymore because we're all shut down.  The term means not essential to critical infrastructure to keep society running.  Except of course your families infrastructure.  That's not "essential" apparently, which is very confusing.  The satire sites again make use of this.



The Babylon Bee (Tag line: Fake news you can trust) is very clever sometimes in pointing out disturbing events with humor.  Our day is sometimes so confounded people have to do double checks to see if the headline was a satire site or one of the mainstream media sites.


Another phrase I hear a lot: "stay home stay safe".  Stay home stay safe seems more applicable to the Utah Highway Patrol billboards that recently displayed that there have been close to 100 deaths on Utah roads in 2020.  Almost the same as the number of deaths from Covid-19 in 2020 on that same date.  Leaving your house, especially to be on Utah roads can be dangerous.



"Flatten the curve" is another term.  It has come to have an unspoken implication of "eradicating" the disease.  This makes no sense but there's an undertone that eradicating the virus is what people somewhat hoped they would get out of locking down.  As if it's not going to spike up again as soon as we go back out into public.  So flatting the curve is more like a "delay of the inevitable".  Seriously, as soon as the shutdown stops the cases are going to go right back up.  But we don't like that so we use weird phrases to help ourselves feel better. 

Perhaps people hoped there would be a cure or a a vaccine by the time we were done being on house arrest.  Which is also nonsensical.  Who knows.

Speaking of flattening the curve..... here's an alternate version for all the parents of multiples out there.  This data model is highly accurate.  lol.



"Do your part" has come to subtly mean taking personal responsibility for unknown quantity of other people's health.  People have a hard enough time managing their own health, but now we're all supposed to act as if we are personally responsible for everyone else's exposure to germs.  I get it if the data supported this level of mass hysteria.  Sure.  But as of today it does not, and the overaction is hurting as many ore more people than it's helping.  

Another one.  Early on in the pandemic the CDC was saying masks were "unnecessary" and had no evidence they helped you avoid catching Corona or giving it to others if you didn't have symptoms.

Direct quote from the WHO:

Advice to decision makers on the use of masks for healthy people in community settings:
As described above, the wide use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not supported by current evidence and carries uncertainties and critical risks
.”

Also from the WHO: March of 2020


Similarly from the Journal of the American Medical Association. Direct quote.

"Face masks should be used only by individuals who have symptoms of respiratory infection such as coughing, sneezing, or, in some cases, fever. Face masks should also be worn by health care workers, by individuals who are taking care of or are in close contact with people who have respiratory infections, or otherwise as directed by a doctor. Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill."

All of that has been completely contradicted by these same organizations.  Mandated masks are the new thing or you can't go to public places. The local pizza joint informs me they will receive a 10k dollar fine for allowing me to not ware a mask in their store.  Costco and my civic and religious leaders keep encouraging me to wear one without regard to symptoms.  Contradicting their own scientifically based statements.  When am I supposed to trust the experts if they contradict themselves and both statements are supposedly science? 

(Update 2/2/21:  Not only are masks now totally mandated.  But double and even triple masking is now being advocated by news organizations, quoting Dr. Fauci).  If 3 is good why not 5?  Who knew that suffocation was the answer?  You can't spread or contract the virus if you can't breathe and are dead.  But I digress.  



It's like we're experiencing a plague of miscommunication and confusion stemming from a mix of political, economic, and media agendas. It causes all the wrong pictures in our heads. The results of which will no doubt include anger and violence and turning on each other. Speaking of turning on each other. A funny story out of New York was that a mayor set up a tip line or a "snitch" line for people to report others who were breaking the social distance guidelines. The residents however flooded the tip line with inappropriate images and obscenities making the tip line useless. 
 
This next picture was posted when President Trump had stopped dictating what Americans could and couldn't do during the pandemic and had turned power over to the State Governors.  Some of whom followed suit and turned some power over to smaller counties and mayors of cities.  A healthy trend.  If that pattern continues eventually everyone might just be able to choose for themselves.  Hopefully choosing to be kind, considerate, and aware of others. 

But back to the meme, the need to prevent continued economic devastation was likely the inspiration behind this.  I found it very funny.   




The local library had to quarantine my kids returned library books yesterday for 48 hours before the health department says it's safe to touch them. I don't envy the job of the health department.  They have this awful task of trying to keep the public safe and healthy and the even more terrible job of having to try to make all these virus rules somehow consistent across all the varying businesses and walks of life.  A thankless job for sure. But not without it's power. The police also have a thankless job dealing with the increases in domestic violence calls and mental health challenges as a result of everything going on.

Next term:  Expert.   These are the trustworthy people who everyone expects to be right and have good solutions to the problems.  The problems is how often the experts are wrong or disagree with each other.  And not to mention that lots of people talk like they are experts.



"Covid deaths" has come to refer to any death where the deceased was even assumed to have had the Corona virus, regardless of other underlying conditions or whether or not there was even a lab test performed to confirm.  The word "assumed" was the CDS's word, not mine.     



Another language thing not specific to the pandemic, but annoying none the less. "Your truth".  This is a misnomer. There is no such thing as your truth. There is "the" truth and "your opinion".  No one can claim to own truth.  You can align with it.  Truth existed before any of us were born so how and on what grounds do we speak in terms of possession of it?  During confounded times telling opinion from truth may not be as easy as I would have assumed.  It's anyone's guess how often they get mixed up.  Our language is a mess.

So what do we do about this confounding of language? These examples are visible with the pandemic but it's part of a much bigger problem affecting everyone.  The scriptural answer to that question would be to repent.  But it's hard to even recognize a message from God or understand it amidst all the confounding.  The religious vocabulary suffers a lot from confounding as well.  But scriptures affirm God does speak, and will set his hand again, and will give light to those who ask.

I wanted to conclude with a few more notes from that Book of Mormon conference I referenced at the beginning of the post.  And that I genuinely hope we can see God's outreached hand in 2020. 

-A good deal of study and research has gone into the shifting language, changes in the meaning of SECULAR words. Far less research has gone into the confounding of language in RELIGION. ...
-John Gee investigated the Book of Mormon claim that discusses the removal “from the gospel of the Lamb many parts which are plain and most precious” (1 Nephi 13:26). He documents early “lexical reinterpretation”, the changing of meanings of words that occurred in first centuries after Christ. He gave several examples of how meanings shifted from the original Greek including “trust” changed to “believe”, “agree” to changed to “confess”, and “rites” to “secret”. (Mysterion)
-The confounding of language continued throughout the centuries, always preceded first the confounding of the people. By the time Joseph saw the Lord in vision the “professors were all corrupt”, teaching “for doctrines the commandments of men” (JS-H 1:19). Much of that “corruption” was seen in the “confounding of language”.
-Then the restoration restored authority, keys and knowledge, to be sure, but also pure language and correct meanings. Consider a few examples:
-As part of the restoration Joseph restored the meaning of many words whose meaning had become confounded: Church, God, the Second Comforter, heaven, spirit world, spirit prison, hell, Eternal, prophet, seer, revelator, apostle, spirit, soul, intelligence, creation and many, many more. No sooner than Joseph corrected words that had been confounded than men moved again to mess them up.
-Jesse W. Crosby relayed this recollection, “when (Joseph) ventured to give his opinion on any subject of importance his words were often garbled and their meaning twisted and then given out as the word of the Lord because they came from him.”
-The “garbling of words” and “twisting meaning” is a pretty fair definition of “confounding of language”.
-In secular language the constant flux of words may be seen as benign, confusing at times, yet somewhat entertaining. In scripture, however, confounding language can be a matter of life and death as Alma points out: 
Behold, the scriptures are before you; if ye will WREST them it shall be to your own destruction. (Alma 13:20)
-Old English, roughly 1600 years old is completely indecipherable to most of us today yet the Book of Mormon is older still, uses words we never use in our everyday conversations yet which of us use a dictionary as a companion to our study of the book. 
-That’s the 2nd Book of Mormon scripture I’ve quoted that uses “destruction” tied to confounding the language
-Doesn’t that seem like wild hyperbole? How could wresting the word lead to destruction?
-WREST is a word we don’t use everyday. Definition #3 in my dictionary says wrest means to “distort the meaning or interpretation of (something) to suit one's own interests or views.” Other definitions use the word “force”. Wresting the scriptures is forcing a meaning out of them not intended by the writers.
-Isn’t Alma being overly dramatic here? How could we possibly force or distort the meaning of the scriptures to our destruction?
-To answer that all we need to do is look at the revelations where the Lord warns the LDS Church. 
-We could teach doctrines which are vain (2 Nephi 28:9) and therefore ineffective, imagining that “at last we will be saved in the kingdom of God. (2 Nephi 28: 8)
-We could teach more or less than Christ taught and establish it (our additions and subtractions) as His doctrine. He warned about that in 3 Nephi 11:40.
-For example, expanding the requirements for baptism beyond His word.
-We could teach less than Christ taught and establish it as His doctrine (3 Nephi 11:40). All scriptural references to Mysteries, for example, are positive. Oliver was commanded to seek for wisdom and the mysteries (D&C 6:7,11). Nephi had a great desire to know the mysteries (1 Nephi 2:16).
-Whether we declare more or less than he declared, In either case “the gates of hell stand open to receive such when the floods come and the winds beat upon them” (3 Nephi 11:40).
-We could act in opposition to Christ by defining His church to be more or less than he defines it. He defined His church as those “repent and come unto Him”. He warned about “declaring more or less than that” in D&C 10:67-68.
-We could covenant with an everlasting covenant and then lose our savor (which means “value” in this context). (D&C 101:39, 103:9-10). For such are cast out and trodden under foot of men.” The former two societies that received this same salt warning have long ago been destroyed.
-The list of religious words that as a people we have confounded reads like a Dictionary of Christianity.  We use words like “testimony”, “perfect”, “peculiar”, “keys”, “Oracles”, “prophet”, “revelation”, in ways that distort their original meanings. Revelation for example originally meant to pull back the vail (re-Vele) not to receive an impression or insight. Testimony was given only of that seen, heard or witnessed- not as we use the term today as a synonym for believe.
-We have garbled the meaning of many words and twisted their meanings which keep us separated from God and confounded.
🔹 It is too late for us to pray that the Lord will not confound our language. Many writers, speakers, scholars and bloggers point out the weakness of our language, the drift that has occurred in the meaning of our words. They try to un-confound our language and hope to return us to a language which is pure but that will require much more than the weak attempts of men, it will require the Lord. For all who will receive instruction from Him, Zephaniah prophesied:
🔹 For then will I turn to the people a pure language, that they may all call upon the name of the Lord, to serve him with one consent. (Zephaniah 3:9). That will occur in the Day of the Lord which I pray will soon be upon us.

Tuesday, March 3, 2020

Organization Fixation Part 1

It is customary to blame secular science and anti-religious philosophy for the eclipse of religion in modern society. It would be more honest to blame religion for its own defeats. Religion declined not because it was refuted, but because it became irrelevant, dull, oppressive, insipid. When faith is completely replaced by creed, worship by discipline, love by habit; when the crisis of today is ignored because of the splendor of the past; when faith becomes an heirloom rather than a living fountain; when religion speaks only in the name of authority rather than with the voice of compassion--its message becomes meaningless 
                                   - God in Search of Man: A Philosophy of Judaism by Abraham Joshua Heschel
Yesterday I came across an article on the LDS Church main web page that was concerning in many ways.  Link here.   It's titled:  The Lord Leads His Church through Prophets and Apostles

The first section of the article is all about how a religious organization is required.  It was posted the same day as this article in the Deseret News.  Which was surprisingly connected.  It begins:
SALT LAKE CITY — The past few years were tough for churches. Worship attendance dropped. Religious disaffiliation rose. 
The Pew Research Center stated in the link that "The Christian share of the U.S. population is declining, while the number of U.S. adults who do not identify with any organized religion is growing."
In seeming counter to those statistics and declining religious affiliation trends published by the Deseret News, the same day the Church released the first article I referenced which begins with very heavy emphasis on just how required religious organizations are.  The content of these two articles seems related. 

I wanted to take a closer look at the Church's article in this two part post. Before I dive in, I first want to distinguish between a few ideas. First is the idea that organization is the opposite of chaos.  A group of people may have various levels of informal organization among themselves, but they are not "an organization". Contrast that with a formal religious organization, or institution.  Typically known as a Church. The article obfuscates these differences and the result is misdirection.  So, I hope to clear away some of that and share some food for thought.

As an example, a local tennis group of guys or gals who play together is organized (tennis requires organization) but isn’t "an" organization.  You can't sue the local group, and you can't tax them.  But they play an organized game and organize themselves to do so. 

The United States Tennis Association (USTA) however, is an organization that the group of players may also belong to, or they may not. You absolutely don't need the USTA or need to belong to the USTA in order to play tennis.  The USTA does offer tournaments, and they have membership benefits for their members but the sport itself is independent of any organization.  It's just tennis, millions of people love and organize themselves to play it. You can organize your own tournament if you want to, and you can play the sport whenever you feel like it without the USTA at all.  The rules are public domain, and you don't even have to keep those if you don't want to. 

Ok, back to the Church article.  The Church’s article repeatedly refers to “an Organization” and goes to lengths to teach you how they are necessary, required, and the medium through which God leads.  The article makes it pretty clear the word organization is primarily referring to a formal institutional religious structure (it says this directly various times in the article).  So when the article says “an organization” it's a formal organizational entity.  Not simply a collection of folks who opt to associate together for some gospel purpose in a non-chaotic way.

That being the case, see what you think of these teachings, all taken from the first section of the article, in bullet form.  I included in parenthesis if the teaching/assertion had any source cited to support the premise.  Remember "an organization" as used in the article is not just a generic lack of chaos among a self-selected group, it's a structured formal entity with people in charge, with procedures and policies that differentiate it from other organizations in the same genre.

So as to have some evidence for my view, going with each quoted bullet I made some food for thought commentary. My intent is not to be negative or critical, it's to exercise my obligation to discern truth from error.

-The work of the Lord requires an organization. (no source cited)

"An" organization it says.  Not the universal concept of being organized vs disorganized.  This bullet, as you can read in the article, has reference to a formal entity.  And they make a very bold claim that the Lord requires this.  Where does the Lord require this?  Are they speaking for the Lord here? 

It's interesting to me how all of these apparent requirements for an organization don't cite any source or evidence for their claims. It's possible this is because they are absolutely false propositions. Organizations with all the current day formality and procedures, structure, policies, rules and keys didn't exist for pretty much all of the Book of Mormon.  The scriptures were often individuals, or families, clans, or groups of believers who kept a record of God's dealings with them.  Anyone with access to a Book of Mormon can read about this.  They needed scriptures and had teachers who taught them the Gospel.  Not formal organizations.

It's been asked if the LDS Church is any closer to Zion today than 100 years ago.  It's an interesting question.  I question whether these organizational requirements are 1. True, and 2. The ideal Gospel setup God has in mind for people.  Such an organizational formality certainly hasn't always been the plan.  And it doesn't appear to have ever produced Zion.  What it has produced in our day is a $120 billion + religious empire in Salt Lake City, Utah.  If that's your goal, then yeah, formal organizations seem like a requirement.

The article in many ways takes our 2020 religious organization and overlays it on top of biblical and BofM history.  As if our current day setup ought to be the lens through which we view scripture.   I believe that is unhelpful and clouds our vision.  Do organized religions have truths?  Of course they do.  But truth is independent of any particular organization and predates all of them (D&C 93:30).

Jesus himself was baptized and received the Holy Ghost without oversight from any religious organization or institution. In fact Jesus was often at odds with the organized religion of the day.  Joseph too was baptized and received the Holy Ghost without "an organization".  So did a whole mass of people in the Book of Mormon.  The BofM was even published before any formal church organization existed.  The City of Enoch was taken to heaven without any mention of any formal organization.

So who is it that is teaching us God's work requires a formal religion?  Interestingly it's a formal religion.  Isn't that ironic?  Most of the assertions have only themselves and their own word as the source.     

-The Lord Leads His people through an organization. (no source cited)

Another bold claim lacking any scriptural support.  The Lord leads through His Spirit doesn't he?  At least that's what He said.   Why would we fixate on a lifeless organizational entity rather than the living Spirit?  Organizations can't even talk.  They need spokespeople, they need lawyers, they can get sued, taxed, and need to maintain positive public image in order to survive.  How many times has scripture taught about being "led by the spirit"?   Versus how many times do scripture reference being "led by the organization"?  Am of off base on this?

Seems curious to be replacing The Lord and the leading through His Spirit with a formal religious organization as God's supposed method of leadership.  

-You cannot have spirituality or religion apart from a religious organization.  (no source cited)

This is an absolutely absurd statement. And lacks common sense.  Guess we'd better toss out half the scriptures because they are without spirituality because they had no religious organization at the time.

Let me get this straight....the deep spirituality of a Native American tribe worshiping the creator is not spirituality or somehow invalid because they don’t have a formal religious organization???  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrLZt4SJ9Qo

How about we go try to convert them with these organizational teachings?  How about we lecture them about just how required "religious organizations" are, and how you can’t have spirituality without them. 
Any guesses as to how successful that will be? It will be as persuasive as having a cactus for a bed. The truth on the other hand is persuasive.  But this bullet from the article sounds like fear and an attempt to convince you that something unnecessary (the current formal organization) is absolutely vital.  In other words, salvation is not possible apart from "the" organization.   

Did Adam and Eve have no spirituality because they didn't have a religious organization?  Did Abraham? Did Enos?  Did the Brother of Jared?  I'm reminded of that phrase from the New Testament:
Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this: to visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the vices of the world.
Pure religion according to scripture were Christian actions, not organizations.  Organizations can't visit the fatherless and widows. (But they can and do extract the widows mite).  Pure religion was to visit the widows in their affliction, visit the fatherless, and stay unspotted.  You're telling me I can't have that or do that apart from a religious institution? That's buffoonery (behavior that's ridiculous, but amusing).

Organizations often do good things. I full well see and acknowledge that. But that is a very different idea than teaching organizations are absolutely required, and you can't access God and spirituality without them.

-Organizations are required in order to accomplish the purposes of the Lord. (no source cited)

It's true that some purposes of the Lord involve a community, like Zion.  But as mentioned earlier, a community or collection of unified people is not the same thing as an organization.  I'm part of a community of tennis players in Davis County, we know each other, play tennis and sometimes hang out. But that has nothing to do with the formal USTA organization.

How many purposes of the Lord have been accomplished by righteous individuals or a community without structured religious organizations?  Did the Christian Reformation fathers like Martin Luther require an organization in order to alter the course of Christianity?  No, he fought the organized religion's corruptions.  The hyper focus on organizational entities elevates the status of religious organizations nigh unto God.  Putting the organization between the individual and God at times.

How many things contrary to God has organized religion done falsely in His name?  Religious organizations throughout history have proven to often become abusive and corrupt. Consolidating money and power. Nephi and Moroni both prophesied that all our churches in our day would go astray and make these exact errors.

Why on earth would the work of God fail to be accomplished by a united community people simply because they lacked a formal religious institution?  The organization promoting these ideas seems to sense it's irrelevance so is grasping at straws.

-God only acts through an organization led by offices/positions that include prophets and apostles.  Who govern, direct, control and supervise.  (no source cited)

This is a relevant subheading:



Not only is an organization required, but the highest-ranking leaders govern the people in the organization according to this article.  Contrast that with these statements from Joseph Smith:
Said he, ‘I do not govern them at all. The Lord has revealed certain principles from the heavens by which we are to live in these latter days. The time is drawing near when the Lord is going to gather out His people from the wicked, and He is going to cut short His work in righteousness, and the principles which He has revealed I have taught to the people and they are trying to live according to them, and they control themselves.’
And on another occasion:
“Some years ago, in Nauvoo, a gentleman in my hearing, a member of the Legislature, asked Joseph Smith how it was that he was enabled to govern so many people, and to preserve such perfect order; remarking at the same time that it was impossible for them to do it anywhere else. Mr. Smith remarked that it was very easy to do that. ‘How?’ responded the gentleman; ‘to us it is very difficult.’ Mr. Smith replied, ‘I teach them correct principles, and they govern themselves.’
-Major efforts to care for the poor are only possible through organized groups. (no source cited)

Also a false statement.  A million individuals doing 1 kind deed for the poor would be a major effort to care for the poor that wouldn't require an organized group to do so.  Just people willing.  Only an organization who wants to take credit for it would say that the organizational entity was required.

Efforts to care for the poor are accomplished by people and yes groups of people who care.... for the poor.  Whether those individuals are part of a formal organization doesn't matter.  The world could undertake a major effort to care for the poor simply by individuals keeping Christ's teachings.  Take away the formal corporate organization and suddenly there is a LOT more money to help the poor, ironically.  It's a lie that you can't care for the poor in a significant way without a formal organization or religion.

-An organization is needed in order to achieve Christ's commandment to "become one".  (no source cited)

Christ never said nor implied this idea.  Another false claim.  Becoming one happens (or potentially happens) for a husband and wife and does not need a Church organization to play middleman in their marriage.  It seems self-evident you can "become one" with others without a formal religious organization. Otherwise we'd all be dependent on an organization in order to keep God's commandments.  God forbid that.  This bullet point from the article is semi-absurd.  Organizations often prevent unity and equality because they have leaders at the top governing the people at the bottom.  They become corrupt, accumulate massive wealth, and often abuse people.  This bullet point taken directly from the article is so misleading it appears to be complete lie.

-Individual believers also need to experience religion through a religious organization because only in this way can we be authoritatively reproved or chastened for sin and error.  (direct quote, no source was cited)

This is another absurd statement with no source and is a lie.  You mean to tell me the only way authoritative reprovals can come is through a religious organization?  That sounds like abuse.  That contradicts every book of scripture we have.  I guess God can't authoritatively correct and chasten whomever he wants, whenever he wants, and however he wants whether on the road to Damascus or inside a cloud for 3 hours.  I'm supposed to accept that only through a religious organization can individual believers be chastened for sin and error?  Wow.  The article cites no evidence for this foul smelling garbage because..... there is no evidence for such nonsense.  The organization is trying desperately to prove itself relevant but it's only showing its irrelevance. 

Whether intentional or not, the Church's recent change to drop the 3-hour block and go to 2 hours and a more home centered approach had the effect of making the Church organization more irrelevant.

-Only an organization with different talents and a variety of efforts can achieve what is necessary to accomplish the Lord’s work.  (no source cited)

Organizations have no talents apart from the people in it, right?  But I agree you need some diversity and efforts to fulfill God's work.  I agree with that.  God's work requires people who obey God.  Oh.... except that apparently that pesky organization wants to insert itself again. Why does that keep cropping up?  Why does this organization keep putting itself between us and God?  Formal organization sometimes hinder God's work by removing equality and creating big people and little people and people in charge and people who get abused. 

It's true different talents and a variety of efforts are needed.  But where again in scripture does God require a formal religion?  Nowhere.  That kind of assertion seems to only be found in the words of the religious organizations and the people leading it.

D&C 109: 8 talks about a house of God. A temple of all things.  It says;
Organize yourselves; prepare every needful thing, and establish a house, even a house of prayer, a house of fasting, a house of faith, a house of learning, a house of glory, a house of order, a house of God;
Organize yourselves it says.  Interesting.  Almost as though being organized is a byproduct of keeping Christ's commandments rather than an organization governing you.

Recap:

How did those teachings from the article sound?  My food for thought commentary probably comes across negative but that is not my intent.  My intent is to simply discern truth from error.  If the teachings in the article sounded like stale cardboard, I agree with you. I can think of few things more mind numbing than uninspiring institutional garbage. Teachings which are self-serving, and can be proven to be falsehoods. By self-serving I mean how convenient that an organization whose existence depends on you believing they are necessary, is the one teaching you religious organizations are necessary.  And by falsehood I mean they have no scriptural support.  None of the assertions cited any backing other than themselves. But you can look at the article yourself and see if I was being unfair in that assessment.

The claims from the Church's Ensign article are that formal organizations are required, and are how God leads his people. However that contradicts scripture, and may in fact be nonsense. As if playing tennis depended on the USTA.

Continued in part 2